-
1 asking not to be identified
English-Russian big medical dictionary > asking not to be identified
-
2 ask not to be identified
English-Russian big medical dictionary > ask not to be identified
-
3 asked not to be identified
English-Russian big medical dictionary > asked not to be identified
-
4 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
5 need
ni:d
1. сущ.
1) необходимость, надобность, нужда to create a need ≈ создавать, формировать потребность to fill, meet, obviate, satisfy a need ≈ отвечать потребности, удовлетворять потребность в чем-л. to minister to smb.'s needs ≈ прислуживать кому-л., обслуживать кого-л. acute, crying, desperate, dire, pressing, urgent need ≈ крайняя, насущная необходимость physical need ≈ физическая потребность spiritual need ≈ духовная потребность unfulfilled need, unmet need ≈ неудовлетворенная потребность There is no need for violence. ≈ Нет необходимости в насилии. There was a pressing need to act immediately. ≈ Необходимо было что-то немедленно предпринять. There was no need for you to go. ≈ Тебе не было необходимости идти. Syn: necessity
2) мн. потребности bodily needs, material needs ≈ материальные потребности
3) а) бедность, недостаток, нехватка, нужда, отсутствие( чего-л.) ;
нищета for need of ≈ из-за недостатка to live in dire need ≈ жить в крайней нужде badly in need ≈ в крайней нужде, бедности in crying need of food ≈ в голоде б) критическая ситуация, экстремальная ситуация Syn: exigency, emergency
2. гл.
1) а) нуждаться( в чем-л.) ;
иметь надобность, потребность to need badly, desperately, sorely ≈ крайне, остро нуждаться б) бедствовать, нуждаться Syn: suffer want, live in poverty, live in misery
2) требоваться, быть необходимым The building needs quite a few repairs. ≈ Зданию требуется порядочный ремонт. The East German regime's agreement was needed for use of the access routes to the city. ≈ Для использования подъездных путей к городу требовалось согласие восточногерманского режима. New comedies are needed most. ≈ Более всего нужны новые комедии. Syn: require
3) (как модальный глагол в вопросительных и отрицательных предложениях) быть должным, обязанным I need not have told you about that. ≈ Мне не следовало Вам этого говорить. надобность, нужда - to be /to stand/ in * of smth., to feel the * of smth., to have * of smth. нуждаться в чем-л. - are you in * of help? не нужна ли вам помощь? - he felt the * of money он нуждался в деньгах, у него было трудно с деньгами - the house is in * of repairs дом требует ремонта - there was a * for caution следовало действовать осмотрительно - there is no * нет надобности - there is no * to worry нет оснований волноваться - is there any * to hurry /for haste/? есть ли смысл /нужно ли/ спешить? - if * be /were/ если бы потребовалось, в случае нужды - when /as, if/ the * arises по мере /в случае/ необходимости - to have * to do smth. быть вынужденным что-л. сделать - there is little * to speak of... нет надобности говорить о... - there is no * for her to work она может не работать /не нуждается в заработке/ pl потребности, нужды, запросы - to meet the *s удовлетворять потребности - daily *s повседневные нужды - spiritual *s духовные запросы - to each according to his *s каждому по потребностям - my *s are few я неприхотлив;
мне много не нужно - to meet the *s of the age соответствовать требованиям времени - to meet the *s of the occasion оказаться на высоте положения нужда, бедность;
нищета - to live /to be/ in * нуждаться, жить в нищете недостаток, нехватка - for * of из-за недостатка, вследствие отсутствия (чего-л.) беда, трудное положение - hour of dire * час испытаний - good at * выручающий в беде /в трудных обстоятельствах/ - they failed him in his * они бросили его в беде стремление - * of a better education стремление к образованию - the * of one's heart веление сердца (редкое) то, что нужно - poorer than was * беднее, чем следовало > * makes the old wife trot (пословица) нужда научит старушку рысью бегать;
нужда научит горшки обжигать > a friend in * is a friend indeed (пословица) друзья познаются в беде нуждаться, иметь надобность, потребность (в чем-л.) - the farmers * rain фермерам нужен дождь - he *s rest он нуждается в отдыхе - they * one another они не могут обойтись друг без друга - this is a book I've been *ing a long time вот книга, которую я давно ищу требовать, чувствовать необходимость (чего-л.) - the dress *s washing платье пора /необходимо/ выстирать - that *s no saying это само собой разумеется;
это ясно без слов - these facts * no comment эти факты не нуждаются в комментариях /не требуют комментариев/ - the letter *s no reply письмо не требует ответа - the book *s correction книга нуждается в исправлении - the soup *s salt в супе не хватает соли - to * a lot of asking заставлять себя просить;
не сразу соглашаться - he *ed no second invitation он не заставил себя просить, он сразу принял приглашение - it *s to... нужно /надо/ (сделать что-л.) - it *s to be done carefully это надо сделать тщательно;
это дело требует осторожности - it *ed doing это надо было сделать - he *s to be careful ему следует проявлять осторожность - you only *ed to ask вам нужно было /стоило/ только спросить - we didn't * to hurry мы могли не торопиться - he does not * to be told ему нечего об этом говорить;
он об этом сам уже знает - he didn't * to be told twice нам не пришлось говорить ему два раза /повторять приказ/;
он понял /повиновался/ с первого слова - it *ed the horrors of war to open their eyes нужны были ужасы войны, чтобы у них открылись глаза;
только ужасы войны открыли им глаза - there *s (устаревшее) требуется - there *s no such apology такие оправдания не нужны, извинений не требуется( ироничное) заслуживать - he *s a lesson его стоит проучить - what he *s is a good whipping ему будет полезна хорошая порка нуждаться, бедствовать - give to them that * помогайте нуждающимся выражает долженствование, обязанность в сочетании с инфинитивом без частицы to;
употребляется преимущественно в волпросительной и отрицательной формах, образуемых без вспомогательного глагола do: - he * not come ему приходить не обязательно, он может и не приходить - you *n't wait вам можно и не ждать;
можете не ждать - you *n't go so early, * you? вам ведь не обязательно уходить так рано, правда? - must I go there? - No, you * not мне нужно /обязательно/ туда идти? - Нет, это не обязательно - you *n't do it if you don't want to не хотите делать - не нужно - he *n't have been in such a hurry ему не к чему было так спешить - you * not trouble yourself вам нечего (самому) беспокоиться;
вам не стоит утруждать себя - * anybody know? разве нельзя сделать так, чтобы никто не знал?, разве обязательно об этом кому-нибудь рассказывать? - he *n't be told ему не обязательно об этом говорить, ему не обязательно нужно об этом знать - we *n't have hurried (оказалось, что) мы могли не торопиться - I * hardly tell you that... вряд ли нужно говорить вам, что... - I don't think that * be considered я считаю, что мы не обязаны принимать это во внимание ~ надобность, нужда;
to be in need of, to feel the need of, to have need of нуждаться ( в чем-л.) ~ требоваться;
the book needs correction книга требует исправления;
it needs to be done with care это надо сделать осторожно dire ~ крайняя нужда ~ надобность, нужда;
to be in need of, to feel the need of, to have need of нуждаться (в чем-л.) ~ недостаток, бедность, нужда;
for need of из-за недостатка ~ надобность, нужда;
to be in need of, to feel the need of, to have need of нуждаться (в чем-л.) the house is in ~ of repair дом требует ремонта I ~ not have done it мне не следовало этого делать;
must I go there? - No, you need not нужно ли мне туда идти?-Нет, не нужно identified ~ личная потребность if ~ be (или were) если нужно, если потребуется ~ требоваться;
the book needs correction книга требует исправления;
it needs to be done with care это надо сделать осторожно ~ потребности;
to meet the needs удовлетворять потребности I ~ not have done it мне не следовало этого делать;
must I go there? - No, you need not нужно ли мне туда идти?-Нет, не нужно need бедность ~ бедствовать ~ (как модальный глагол в вопросительных и отрицательных предложениях) быть должным, обязанным;
you need not trouble yourself вам нечего (самому) беспокоиться ~ быть должным, обязанным ~ быть необходимым ~ иметь надобность ~ надобность, нужда;
to be in need of, to feel the need of, to have need of нуждаться (в чем-л.) ~ надобность, нужда ~ недостаток, бедность, нужда;
for need of из-за недостатка ~ недостаток, бедность ~ недостаток ~ необходимость ~ нехватка ~ нищета ~ нужда ~ нуждаться, иметь надобность, потребность ~ нуждаться, бедствовать ~ нуждаться (в чем-л.) ;
иметь надобность, потребность;
what he needs is a good thrashing он заслуживает хорошей взбучки ~ нуждаться ~ потребность ~ требоваться;
the book needs correction книга требует исправления;
it needs to be done with care это надо сделать осторожно ~ требоваться ~ потребности;
to meet the needs удовлетворять потребности ~ нуждаться (в чем-л.) ;
иметь надобность, потребность;
what he needs is a good thrashing он заслуживает хорошей взбучки I ~ not have done it мне не следовало этого делать;
must I go there? - No, you need not нужно ли мне туда идти?-Нет, не нужно ~ (как модальный глагол в вопросительных и отрицательных предложениях) быть должным, обязанным;
you need not trouble yourself вам нечего (самому) беспокоиться
См. также в других словарях:
United Kingdom — a kingdom in NW Europe, consisting of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: formerly comprising Great Britain and Ireland 1801 1922. 58,610,182; 94,242 sq. mi. (244,100 sq. km). Cap.: London. Abbr.: U.K. Official name, United Kingdom of Great… … Universalium
United States — a republic in the N Western Hemisphere comprising 48 conterminous states, the District of Columbia, and Alaska in North America, and Hawaii in the N Pacific. 267,954,767; conterminous United States, 3,022,387 sq. mi. (7,827,982 sq. km); with… … Universalium
Egypt — • Provides information on history, religion, and literature Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Egypt Egypt † … Catholic encyclopedia
South Asian arts — Literary, performing, and visual arts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Myths of the popular gods, Vishnu and Shiva, in the Puranas (ancient tales) and the Mahabharata and Ramayana epics, supply material for representational and… … Universalium
Jesus myth theory — The Resurrection of Christ by Noel Coypel (1700). Jesus myth theorists see this as one of a number of stories about dying and rising gods. Description The … Wikipedia
USS Liberty incident — Coordinates: 31°23′N 33°23′E / 31.39°N 33.38°E / 31.39; 33.38 … Wikipedia
metaphysics — /met euh fiz iks/, n. (used with a sing. v.) 1. the branch of philosophy that treats of first principles, includes ontology and cosmology, and is intimately connected with epistemology. 2. philosophy, esp. in its more abstruse branches. 3. the… … Universalium
Emmett Till — in a photograph taken by his mother on Christmas Day 1954, about six months before his murder. Scholars state that when the photo ran in the Jackson Daily News Emmett Till and his mother were given a profound pathos in the fl … Wikipedia
Apollo Root Cause Analysis — The primary purpose of root cause analysis is to identify the causes of undesirable events such that they do not happen again. Apollo root cause analysis can also be used to identify the causal relationships of desirable events such that they can … Wikipedia
Lee Harvey Oswald — This article is about the life of Lee Harvey Oswald. For discussion of Oswald and the assassination of John F. Kennedy, see Assassination of John F. Kennedy and John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. Lee Harvey Oswald Lee Harvey… … Wikipedia
Belle Gunness — Infobox Serial Killer name=Belle Gunness caption=Belle Gunness with her children Lucy and Myrtle Sorenson, and Phillip Gunness birthname=Brynhild Paulsdatter Størseth alias= birth=November 11 1859 location=Selbu, Norway death= April 28, 1908 ?… … Wikipedia